Friday, June 19, 2009

Specialisation

Well well.....I took a loooooong break this time. Though I thought no one cared but breathtakingly some did!!! they asked me why I didn't update it.....
I thought that better than answering them I should probably write something....so I just sat before my computer and thought I should write on something.....
I was listening to some songs and this one song by Oasis named 'Specialise'.....struck me.....a great deal about specialisation started coming into my mind....so I thought that my 'topic hunt' is over...
So.....


The universe in which we live is said to have started from nothing.......nothingness exploded into so much that it is still expanding. What was that force which caused this explosion....is not the question I wish to discuss right now... but the topic of discussion is that what materialized it?? Why aren’t we spiritual and religious and why are we material in our day-to-day practise?? I contemplated a lot and thought that the answer might be ‘Specialisation’.

So, at the beginning it was all nothing....then occurred ‘Big Bang’ and eventually specialisation took place. The things which specialized in energy were called energy and things specialising in matter were called matter. In matter; things specialised in planets, stars, satellites and other celestial things. The ones which didn’t specialize in anything formed the vacuum......the space. Matter also specialised into Living and Non-Living. Life first came in water and then few cells specialised to walk on land, some specialised in flying!!...and the evolutionary specialisation continued. Some specialised into plants and diversified our environment. Darwin’s theory of evolution has its keyline saying ‘Survival of the fittest’ but it should have been ‘Survival of the Specialised’.

After several specialisations man was born. He specialised into tribes and civilizations. Some specialised in their works into carpenters, farmer, labourers etc. Some specialised in power to become coons, leaders, soldiers, social servants etc. Some specialised in their views and became sophists, teachers, philosophers etc. Some in exchange and economics and became businessmen, traders, exporters etc.

Some specialised in worship and eventually into religions, and then gradually specialisations occurred within these religions, like Catholics, Protestants, shia, sunni, shaiv, vaishnav etc. Initially we worshipped one God then these Gods started to specialise into several other sub-gods.....some for wars, some for love, some for prosperity etc....... though these specialisations were brought about by Man alone but he boldly establishes that they were due to the Gods themselves!!! Knowledge also specialised into philosophy and science and they were further developed into an assortment of groupings. Then these subjects specialised into several sub-divisions. I could only imagine the extent of specialisation when my dentist asked me to consult some other dentist because I had problem in my 19th tooth whereas he dealt only in the first 14!!!

Our houses specialised according to our habitats. Now there are several specialisations in food....seasoning, baking, sizzling, mixing etc.

At the outset only one king managed the whole kingdom but now we have several departments and portfolios to manage smaller areas like that of roads, bridges, malaria, transport etc. Thus you can deduce easily that whatever you do is specialised, in this manner you are a specialist....no matter if your work is petty or you are some thug!!!! You a thief....you are a specialist; you a clerk you are a specialist!!! Because only you can do your work, no one else can do it better than you.

Right now we are developing new specialisations everyday. That is why we say that ‘Universe is Expanding’. The moment this specialisation stops our world will start to shrink and we will say that the ‘Universe is Contracting’.

One nice morning it just struck me that I could easily define meditation, pride and salvation on the basis of specialisation.

Pride is simply to feel that your specialisation is unique or is rare.

Meditation is to discard the sense of superiority of your specialisation. The moment you forget your specialisation.....you are meditating. People have tried several ways to meditate and elevate but this is the best and simplest.....you just forget the reason you think you are unique for and you are meditating.

And

Salvation......when you discard the thought of your specialisation you are meditating but when you discard your specialisation as a whole you attain salvation because specialisation is a material thing and discarding it completely would take you to the divine level.

We humans are only using a certain part of our brains; just a small percentage; a major part of our gray matter is a waste; but when we start using more and more of it.....our dimensions of specialisations would increase and after several specialisations maybe we would see that all the specialisations which we did were identical.......... it was just that we couldn’t see their unity!! But presently we are progressing on the Specialisation road and it might be that after the ‘Dead End’ we would have to return back. Then new specialisations will have to be made so that we could return. For instance, we specialised on how to clear villages and forests to develop towns and cities and now we are specialising on how to clear townships to develop villages and forests. English.....the universal language is spreading throughout the world thus decreasing specialisation.

One might ask me that why am I so much opposed to specialisation??.....there can be two answers to this......

1. 1. I oppose specialisation in the same manner as people oppose materialism.

2. 2. Maybe criticising specialisation is my specialisation!!!!

Friday, May 1, 2009

The Blue Pill or The Red Pill??

“You take the blue pill -- the story ends, you wake up in your bed and believe whatever you want to believe." Morpheus, The Matrix ------http://www.youtube.com/v/uGQF8LAmiaE

In The Matrix Universe, an authorized member of a Zion crew offers a prospective human in the Matrix a choice of ingesting a red pill. Doing so activates a trace program that allows the crew to locate the human's body in the Matrix powerplant. Once the person is found, commands are sent to the pod to awaken the person.

Red pills appear to have either seen "glitches" from the Matrix (e.g. a book continuously respawning on a shelf, regardless of attempts to remove the book), or have such a nature and/or awareness as to question their life within the Matrix, and refuse to dismiss the strange events - basically those who have figured out the illusion of the Matrix.

According to the character Morpheus, exiting the Matrix can be traumatic, particularly to those who have lived in it for too long. As a rule, crews normally only offer the red pill to those no older than teenage. After that, the risk of denial and psychotic episodes from the reality of separation could increase. This rule was violated by Morpheus in rescuing Neo, who was approximately 30 years old.—from Wikipedia

The BLUE Pill or the RED Pill??

The RED Pill is the path of Philosophy and Reasoning and Critical Thinking and Science and testing.  The BLUE Pill is that of belief and emotional decision making.   Which shall it be?

One of the core themes of The Matrix is the concept that if you want to transform your world, you must first identify how you have been programmed, decide whether the programming is accurate, then decide whether to reprogram yourself.

As a simple start to the Red Pill path or some further steps along that path you might  go to http://www.snopes.com and find five of the beliefs that you have held to be true that are not true and you have just learned that they are not true by going to this site.

Another exercise would be to realize that you already should be aware that things are not always as they appear to be or as we are led to believe. Name one such thing in your life.

This should open up to the possibility that not all beliefs that we hold to be true are actually true and that it might be of some value to question beliefs and to examine them to determine which beliefs have more evidence and reason to support them and distinguish them from others with less support.   Philosophy is a method for doing that examination concerning some of the most basic questions and issues human have ever confronted.

Is it better to live a harsh reality or a comfortable fantasy? And why? This is one interpretation of a key question faced by Neo, the hero of the movie The Matrix. Neo has a conversation with Morpheus, who explains that what Neo has always perceived as “reality,” including his friends, his job, and his entire existence in 20thcentury America, is actually a simulation caused by a race of computers that has taken over earth long ago and has enslaved human beings. Our brains, according to Morpheus, are simply kept alive in a fantasy world so that we can provide electricity to the machines. But a few individuals are occasionally able to disconnect themselves from this matrix of fantasy and regain control of their body, thereby fighting a desperate battle for supremacy on the planet. Now, Morpheus says, Neo has two choices. If he takes a blue pill that he is being offered, he will forget about the matrix and go back to his illusory but relatively safe and predictable life. Take the red pill, however, and you will see the world as it really is. The trade-off is clear: comfortable fantasy or harsh reality? What would you choose, and why?

Some may question the assumptions underlying the choice. What makes us think that Morpheus is telling the truth? What if it is the red pill that leads to an imaginary world? This is a valid epistemological point. How do you know what is real and what is not? What kind of evidence do you have that you were dreaming last night of being a butterfly, and are you not in fact a butterfly who is now dreaming of being a human being? There are some reasonable, though by no means foolproof, ways out of this basic dilemma. For example, dreams—unlike what we consider reality—have no temporal continuity and are often characterized by arbitrary rules of engagement (contrary to, say, the laws of physics). But Neo did not have such a luxury, since in his case both situations felt very real. Furthermore, some people on drugs, or affected by particular brain disorders, really do have a hard time distinguishing between reality and hallucinations.

However, this kind of existential response based on radical skepticism skirts an interesting question. Let us assume that we have good reasons to believe Morpheus (as Neo does in the movie, given some recent disturbing experiences that had shaken his conception of reality); what would you then do about it?

In essence, the choice can be seen as one between truth and happiness (albeit the latter may be of a rather limited variety). In this sense, the question becomes of utmost interest and of surprising practical relevance. For example, you are faced by this dilemma when you examine your religious beliefs. Since there is no more evidence for the existence of a god than for the existence of unicorns, but believing in god makes you feel more comfortable and gives eternal meaning to your life, should you believe the unbelievable or attempt to find your way through the tortuous road of secular morality and meaning? Of course, most people don’t really choose to believe in a god, they rather culturally inherit such belief from their parents and friends; but most of us do arrive at the rejection of god by an often long process of questioning during which we are faced with terrible questions of existential meaning and of good and evil. In this sense, consciously becoming an agnostic or atheist is indeed more difficult than the other path, and it is like taking Neo’s red pill.

Less controversial (if you actually believe in god and don’t therefore buy the above argument) but equally dramatic is the choice of taking or not taking drugs. The “reality” offered by drugs is more pleasurable (at least temporarily) than the real life out there, especially for poor or psychologically damaged people. Why not avoid the pain and go for the blue option? The same question could be framed in terms of why spend your time reading this blog which is talking of some elusive and out of the place things rather than watching ,say, some video on youtube?

Surveys show that most people chose the red pill, yet I found quite a bit of disagreement on the motives. Essentially, however, there are two main reasons that can be advanced for taking red over blue: pragmatic and ethical ones.

The pragmatic motive is that living in an imaginary world can be pretty dangerous. One of the reasons human beings have been so successful during evolution is precisely because our large brains have an uncanny capability of assessing reality, of finding cause-effect connections, and therefore of manipulating the world to our advantage. One could object that plenty of people in modern society believe all sorts of weird things, from astrology to gods, and yet seem to function reasonably well. But this is because, in fact, most of the time they do not act on their beliefs. For example, while many people would claim to leave their lives in god’s hands when they are so questioned, they nevertheless take out insurance policies, look on both sides of the road before crossing, and go regularly to the doctor, if they can afford it. When they do behave according to a strict adherence to fantastic beliefs, bad things happen. A recurrent example is offered by Christian Scientists who die (or, worse, let their children die) because they do not believe in getting medical attention when they are sick. Reality does have a way of biting your back side!!!

The ethical reason represents an even more general answer to Neo’s question: regardless of practical consequences or of feelings of pleasure and discomfort, it is simply right to choose the red pill. We are social beings, and by nature we have a tendency to relate to other humans and to help them out, especially if they are our kin or friends. This tendency constitutes the basis of most of our ethical systems, and it implies that it is our duty not to shut ourselves out of the world in order to simply seek pleasure or avoid pain. This, however, begs the question of what is right to begin with and of how we determine it. Essentially, we are now faced with the radical moral skeptic question: why bother, if it does not affect your own happiness?

The point is, even a science fiction movie can generate profound philosophical questions, and these in turn are not necessarily idle speculations on the sex of angels but give us the opportunity to examine some of our most basic choices and their often far-reaching consequences. And remember, an unexamined life is not worth living. Or is it? And finally you answer honestly in the comments that which pill would you take???...The Blue Or The Red??

Sunday, April 26, 2009

Understanding Memory (Part 2)

In my last article.....I pointed out a 'probable' relation between Memory and Understanding!!!!!!!!
Well I would like to thank my friend Sukrit for helping me out further with it and point out the many flaws in it......which has strengthened my theory further and also did a slight modification......I donno how to put that conversation before you so I thought that best way would be to put it exactly before you as it took place!!! So here it is,
me: hey!!
 sukrit1990: hi
 me: so wassup?
 sukrit1990: nothing yaar
  bas gettin bored
10:13 AM tum batao... read my comments?
 me: yaaah
 sukrit1990: :)
 me: quite good argument
  but you know m talkin about long time intervals
10:14 AM when u r into memorizing alot n a lot......u consequently lose ur ability to understand
all u know is how to mugup
10:15 AM sukrit1990: really mae?
  is that so?
  hey c'mon
 me: yeah that's wat i've observed
  !!!
  n read!!!
10:16 AM sukrit1990: i memorized lots of poems in nursery class
  i still remember them and my power to understand is still there
 me: ha ha......that's ur versatile stage
  ur mind is very flexible at that stage
10:18 AM 
u learn manythings at that stage..............but that dosen't mean that u gonna do it whole of ur life
  :)
When I was younger, I could remember anything, whether it had happened or not.
10:19 AM sukrit1990: achcha ..... let me take u to a different level
 me: yeah
10:20 AM sukrit1990: why didnt u plot a straight line with slope of -1?
  why is it a hyperbola?
  u mean to say when u are not understanding...... u can memorize infinitely?
10:21 AM me: yeah that's human mind
10:22 AM i say that there's a possibility
  that u cud do it
  but not neccesarily everyone
  !!!
 sukrit1990: hmmmm...... okie
10:23 AM me: kmow a diseaes called somewhat 'savant' something
  wait a sec
10:24 AM yeah "AUTISTIC SAVANT'
  :)
  u cud read it
10:25 AM According to Treffert, something that almost all savants have in common is a prodigious memory of a special type, a memory that he describes as "very deep, but exceedingly narrow".[1]
  get it???
 sukrit1990: hmmmm...... ya..... but thats a disease man
10:26 AM me: shudn't we include diseased humans in our studys???
  well u cant say that's a diseases!!
10:27 AM that can b looked upon as a special ability
10:28 AM sukrit1990: okie ... call it a special ability..... but special abilities shud be considered as exceptions .... not as ur study
  :)
10:29 AM me: well ur seeing the infinite end of that graph is also an exception!!!
  u cud neveer reach it...talking theoritically
10:31 AM satisfied
  ?
 sukrit1990: not at all
  firstly... i dont think they shud be inversely related
  secondly..... even if they are, it shud not be a hyperbola
10:32 AM me: ok i m not very certain about the shape of the graph
  its jst a possibility
 sukrit1990: haan.... can be
  but an intereseting theory on a whole
10:33 AM something on which i would like to study bout
  and discuss
10:34 AM me: is the rest of the theory satisfying
  ?
  to u?
10:35 AM sukrit1990: i only read this theory till now
  still have to read the others
 me: do u know others too?
10:36 AM sukrit1990: not yet
 me: ha ha
  well then thanx for this discussion'
 sukrit1990: hahaha
  in fact i shud thank u
  a really nice theory
10:37 AM me: it has help me identify several loopholes in it
  n it'll help me improve it
 sukrit1990: keep working on it
 me: like i haven't described many points in it
 sukrit1990: who knows.. u can get a nobel prize for it
 me: which i'll describe now
10:38 AM n plz tell ny other u find
        sukrit1990: ya sure
    me: i'll say u read one on superstition
  its got another of my theory
 10:40 AM 
sukrit1990: sure
 me: thanx again ......bbyeeee
 sukrit1990: bye bye
 me: gotta study for my class tests
 sukrit1990: kk
 me: gotta both memorize n understand!!!
10:41 AM haha
 sukrit1990: hahahaa
 me: bbyeeeeeee
 sukrit1990: best of luck
  bye
 me: thanx
So I think that you might have gotta know what actually was the problem with it!!.....once again I would thank Sukrit for his contribution.>:)